۱۳۸۷ بهمن ۲, چهارشنبه

Time To Tell The Truth About:http://www.rense.com/general84/isz.htm

http://www.njdc.org/site/page/rahm_emanuel


Huge Web Portal Brings Wealth To The Masses!

Time To Tell The Truth About Israel ...




Without Fear Of The
Mind Police The Thought Censors Don't Like It?
ToughThe David Icke NewsletterCopyright David Icke, 2009.
All Rights Reserved. 1-6-9
So, yet again, the people of the virtual-concentration camp, known officially as 'Gaza', are being bombarded from the sky by the bully-boys of Tel Aviv.
State-of-the art Israeli jets, paid for by the United States, bomb civilian targets in this tragic, poverty-stricken wasteland which acts as a holding camp for the human beings the Israeli government would rather be dead. Waiting in the wings are Israeli tanks preparing for a possible ground invasion of Gaza, again paid for by the United States.
The world watches as a nation of people, the Palestinians, are systematically crushed and destroyed by the tyrants who call the shots in Israel on behalf of that country's real power structure ­ the House of Rothschild.
And, taxpayers of America (and elsewhere), you are paying for this calculated slaughter.
The Palestinian 'territories' of Gaza and the West Bank
American aid to Israel accounts for something like a third of all US overseas aid when Israel is home to just .001 per cent of the global population and has one of the highest incomes per head in the world. This is even without all the 'private' donations from US corporations and individuals which are tax-deductible even when given to the Israeli military, unlike any other foreign power.
According to 2007 figures, the United States government gave more than $6.8 million to wealthy Israel every day while to the desperate and devastated Palestinians of the Gaza Strip and the West Bank they gave just $300,000.
US military 'aid' to Israel increased by more than a quarter to an average $3 billion a year in 2007 ­ a figure guaranteed for ten years. This and other support makes Israel the biggest recipient of United States foreign military funding since the Second World War.
The United States is also Israel's biggest supplier of fighter planes, weapons and other military technology. As a result, Israel has the world's largest F-16 fleet outside the "United States Air Force" US Air Force. In their
book, The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy, John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt write:
'Since the October War in 1973, Washington has provided Israel with a level of support dwarfing the amounts provided to any other state. It has been the largest annual recipient of direct U.S. economic and military assistance since 1976 and the largest total recipient since World War ll. Total direct U.S. aid to Israel amounts to well over $140 billion in 2003 dollars.
Israel receives about $3 billion in direct foreign assistance each year, which is roughly one-fifth of America's entire foreign aid budget. In per capita terms, the United States gives each Israeli a direct subsidy worth about $500 per year. This largesse is especially striking when one realizes that Israel is now a wealthy industrial state with a per capita income roughly equal to South Korea or Spain.'
Why do they do this? Because the House of Rothschild controls Israel and the House of Rothschild controls the political system of the United States. The network that links the two is called 'Zionism', a Rothschild creation ­ just like Israel itself.
The might of this Zionist cabal spanning Israel, the United States, Europe and beyond is yet again, like the playground bully that it is, attacking the little kid in the calipers ­ the people of Gaza.
At the time of writing the death toll is 430 Palestinian men, women and children with more than 2,000 injured. They are bombing the unarmed innocent knowing there will be no credible response ­ the way all bullies operate. Oh, brave men of Israel; oh how Yahweh would be so proud:
'When the LORD your God hands these nations over to you and you conquer them, you must completely destroy them. Make no treaties with them and show them no mercy.'

Deuteronomy 7:1-4
What we are seeing in Gaza, and have seen so many times, both there and in the Lebanon, is merciless Old Testament slaughter: cold, calculated, heartless slaughter.
'So they sent twelve thousand warriors to Jabesh-gilead with orders to kill everyone there, including women and children. "This is what you are to do," they said. "Completely destroy all the males and every woman who is not a virgin".'

Judges 21:10-24
'Then I heard the LORD say to the other men, "Follow him through the city and kill everyone whose forehead is not marked. Show no mercy; have no pity! Kill them all ­ old and young, girls and women and little children. But do not touch anyone with the mark. Begin your task right here at the Temple".'
Ezekiel 9:5-7
'So they began by killing the seventy leaders. "Defile the Temple!" the LORD commanded. "Fill its courtyards with the bodies of those you kill! Go!" So they went throughout the city and did as they were told.'
Ezekiel 9:5-7
The parallels are endless between the bloodthirsty 'God' of the Old Testament and the actions of the heartless, soulless, Artificial Intelligence that controls Israel, most notably the biological robots of the House of Rothschild who thus have no soul, no empathy, no more mercy for the consequences of their actions than a desktop computer.
Imagine if Iran or anyone else outside Israel and the United States (both Rothschild assets) was doing what the Israeli military is doing in Gaza. There would be global condemnation, not least from Israel and the United States, resolutions passed in the UN Security Council and talk of the need for sanctions or military intervention to 'save the innocent'.
But when Israel does it we have vacuous calls for a truce, an end to the violence while 'understanding Israel's position', and, in terms of soon-to-be President 'Change' Obama, silence. It's all a fraction of what others would face because Israel is a wholly-owned asset of the Rothschilds and so is not subject to the same rules as anyone else. As former Israeli Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon, said:
'Israel may have the right to put others on trial, but certainly no one has the right to put the Jewish people and the State of Israel on trial.'
And Prime Minister Golda Meir betrayed the same Zionist arrogance:
'This country exists as the fulfilment of a promise made by God Himself. It would be ridiculous to ask it to account for its legitimacy.'
Ah, it's all in the Old Testament? Gotcha, right, well do as you like then.
The 'Jewish homeland' was from the start a Rothschild fiefdom orchestrated through the global secret society network of interbreeding families known as the Illuminati.

















During the Israeli military attacks on the Lebanon in 2006, the Israeli writer, Barry Chamish, told of a meeting with Evelyn Rothschild's grandson, who abandoned the family to be a M
ormon (so actually he didn't, even if he thought he did).

Chamish said he learned that just seven families were enjoying the 'fruits of the war' with the Lebanon. The grandson had said of the Rothschilds: 'They created Israel as their personal toy. It makes them richer and gives them more control. It's not going to be destroyed.'
The Rothschilds funded the early European settlers in Israel, manipulated events in Germany that led to the horrific treatment of Jewish people and others, and then used that as the excuse to reach their long-term goal - a Rothschild-Illuminati stronghold in Palestine using the Jewish population as fodder to be used and abused as necessary.
They called their plan 'Zionism'. This term is often used as a synonym for Jewish people when it is actually a political movement devised and promoted through the House of Rothschild and
opposed by many Jews.


























Poster for the Irgun terrorist group

The Israeli bully-boys spend most of their time condemning the terrorism of others and yet their very State was created through terrorism of the most grotesque kind via groups like Irgun and the Stern Gang, which bombed and terrorised Israel into being.
Among the leading lights in these and other terrorist groups were Menachem Begin, Yitzhak Shamir and Ariel Sharon, butchers who became Israeli Prime Ministers and had the nerve to condemn Arab terrorism. And to this day the butchery goes on with the goal of destroying the Palestinian people.
After the Rothschild-controlled Zionist terrorists had bombed the State of Israel into existence in 1948, an estimated 800,000 Palestinians were made refugees and fled what had been their own country. Their descendents are said to number some four million.
And the world simply looked on ­ just as it does to this day ­ because Israel is a law unto itself and so terms like justice, fairness, decency and mercy do not apply.
Palestinian families fleeing the newly-imposed Israel after their country was occupied by Zionist terrorism in 1948.
The idea was always to destroy the Palestinian people step-by-step long before Israel was even created. The Balfour Declaration of 1917, in which the Rothschild-controlled British government supported the establishment of a 'Jewish' homeland in Palestine, said that 'nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of the existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine'.
But the Rothschild sidekick Chaim Weizmann would later say: 'With regard to the Arab question - the British told us that there are several hundred thousand Negroes there but this is a matter of no consequence'. Nor have they been ever since and the goal of destroying them is closer today than ever before.
The first Prime Minister of Israel, yet another terrorist called David Ben-Gurion, made no secret of this fact within his inner circle. Former Israel Prime Minister, Yitzhak Rabin, said in an uncensored version of his memoirs, published in the New York Times on 23 October 23rd, 1979:
'We walked outside, Ben-Gurion accompanying us. Allon repeated his question - What is to be done with the Palestinian population?' Ben-Gurion waved his hand in a gesture which said "Drive them out!"'
The current bombing campaign against the Gaza Palestinians is just the latest step to that end. They have forced Palestinians into a Gaza Strip that is little more than a massive concentration camp in which they control all that goes in and out, people or supplies of food, medicines and other essentials.
When the Israelis close the border posts, that's it, the Palestinians are trapped and at the mercy of the soulless and heartless that control the Tel Aviv government and military under Rothschild direction. And those border posts are closed now while Israel bombs the crap out of Gaza, despite calls for humanitarian aid to be allowed through.
My theory is that the Israeli government can't hear those calls because their computer brains can't compute the term 'humanitarian' or, for that matter, 'aid', unless it is followed by the words 'for Israel from the United States'. Then it's loud and clear.
One writer recently described conditions in Gaza:
' Israel nails shut the coffin that is Gaza under a siege that has lasted nearly three years, steadily intensifying so that malnutrition rates rival those of sub-Saharan Africa, sewage runs raw in the streets and pollutes the ocean, homes are still being bulldozed to super-add collective punishment upon collective punishment; men, women and children are still being sniped at and killed; children are deafened by continuing sonic booms, the vast majority of them suffer from post-traumatic stress syndrome, and many of that majority have no ambition other than becoming "martyrs" '
How can anyone inflict such a lack of mercy on an entire people? The question can only be answered when we understand that Zionist extremists really do believe they are God's Chosen People and that therefore the Palestinians are little more than cattle.
The Israel Prime Minister and terrorist, Menachem Begin, described the Palestinians in a speech to the Israeli parliament as 'beasts walking on two legs'. Another Prime Minister and terrorist, Yitzhak Shamir, told Jewish settlers in 1988 that the Palestinians 'would be crushed like grasshoppers ... heads smashed against the boulders and walls.'
Prime Minister and terrorist, Ariel Sharon, then Israeli Foreign Minister, confirmed in 1998 what the plan really was for the Palestinians:
'It is the duty of Israeli leaders to explain to public opinion, clearly and courageously, a certain number of facts that are forgotten with time. The first of these is that there is no Zionism, colonialisation, or Jewish State without the eviction of the Arabs and the expropriation of their lands.'

The plan is to kill or drive out the Palestinian people using poverty, hunger and war and so allow the Zionists to expand into 'Greater Israel'. That plan is now well advanced.
In early 2008, the United Nations' leading humanitarian affairs official said he was 'shocked' by the 'grim and miserable' conditions in Gaza. Undersecretary General John Holmes blamed this on Israel closing the border crossings and so limiting the supply of food and other materials ­ just as they are doing today.
He said: 'All this makes for a grim human and humanitarian situation here in Gaza, which means that people are not able to live with the basic dignity to which they are entitled'.
But they are just 'beasts walking on two legs', right?
Richard Falk, the UN Human Rights Council Special Rapporteur on the occupied territories, has also condemned Israel for its actions in Gaza. He is Jewish and therefore much more dangerous to the Israel government because he can't be dismissed as the old favourite 'anti-Semitic'. Or maybe he is a 'self-hater', the tag given by these sick people to those Jews who speak out against Israel.
Falk's punishment for daring to criticise the Promised Land as a UN official was to be held for 20 hours and then denied entry to the country and so he is prevented from doing his job of reporting on conditions for the Palestinian people during the current air attacks.
His entry was denied in mid-December ­ perfect timing not to be there for the latest bombing that they knew was coming. Click
here for an interview with Richard Falk
The Bush administration for the last eight years has been dominated by the Neo-conservative, or 'Neocon', network which is, itself, dominated by US/Israeli duel citizens and/or Zionists like Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Pearle, Dov Zackheim, William Kristol, Robert Kagan, Elliot Abrams, Douglas Feith, John Bolton, Robert B Zoellick, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and others. The neo-con godfather is the late Leo Strauss, a German-born Jewish 'philosopher', who believed that people must be governed by a 'pious elite'.

Butsurely those days of Zionist dominance are over because 'Mr. Change' is coming to 'power' now. Er, if only. Barack Obama has packed his 'new' administration with Zionists like
Rahm Emanuel, his White House Chief of Staff.
Emanuels' father, Benjamin, was a member of the Irgun terrorist group in Palestine that I mentioned earlier and we can clearly expect the Obama administration to be balanced and fair on its Israel/Palestinian policy. No wonder Obama has kept quiet on the Israeli bombing of Gaza.



Obama speaks out on Gaza crisis: 'Hey, I got nothin' to say, I got the chance of a par here ask my Chief of Staff, he's a rabid Zionist and his dad helped bomb Israel into existence. He'll know what's goin' on.'
The Obama government is going to be slavishly pro-Israel because he needed the sanction of the truly massive Zionist lobby in the United States to secure the presidency. His vice-president, Joe Biden, is a long-time bag-carrier for Israel. He said on Israeli television: 'I am a Zionist - you don't have to be a Jew to be a Zionist'. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is another Israel puppetess who pledged to 'obliterate' Iran if it launched a nuclear attack on God's chosen country.
Would she say she would obliterate Israel if it launched a nuclear attack on Iran? No way.
The Palestinians have never had a chance because the table is weighted, the game is rigged and it always has been. At the time of the First World War, the Rothschild-controlled British government told the Palestine Arabs that if they fought the Ottoman Turks and forced them to leave Palestine and other lands they would be rewarded with an independent Palestine.
The Palestinian Arabs agreed and with support from the British through HYPERLINK "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lieutenant_Colonel" \o "Lieutenant Colonel" Lieutenant Colonel Thomas Edward Lawrence ­ 'Lawrence of Arabia' ­ the Ottoman Empire was defeated. But their reward was not independence. It was first rule by a British 'Mandate' and then occupation by Zionist Israel.
The Arabs were lied to, as Lawrence later admitted, and they have been lied to ever since. All these 'road maps' and 'peace processes' are always designed to lead nowhere. They are just holding positions to maintain the status quo until the Palestinians are basically no more.
The Israelis always say they are killing people in 'retaliation' for attacks by the Palestinian group, Hamas, which officially controls the Gaza 'authority', although control is hardly the word with Israel deciding what and who goes in and out.
Hamas operatives are firing low-tech rockets that have so far killed four people. Terrible, yes, and it should not be happening. I have no brief for Hamas, which is another tyranny in its own way, but ask yourself this: What would you do if you were faced with the situation the Palestinians are in after sixty years of oppression and persecution while the world does nothing?
If you remove the injustice, you remove the motivation for a violent response to that injustice. Put people in a position where they either accept their pathetic plight or open fire and some are bound to choose the latter.
But instead of tackling the root cause, injustice, Israel responds with a state-of-the-art bombardment that kills hundreds and injures thousands in a few days, at least 90% of which are men, women and children who have nothing whatsoever to do with the rocket attacks. In 2007, 25 Palestinians were killed for every Israeli. That's more than just 'protecting yourself'.
As Jewish UN representative, Richard Falk, said a few days ago:
'The Israeli airstrikes on the Gaza Strip represent severe and massive violations of international humanitarian law as defined in the Geneva Conventions, both in regard to the obligations of an Occupying Power and in the requirements of the laws of war ...
Those violations include:
· Collective punishment: The entire 1.5 million people who live in the crowded Gaza Strip are being punished for the actions of a few militants. · Targeting civilians: The airstrikes were aimed at civilian areas in one of the most crowded stretches of land in the world, certainly the most densely populated area of the Middle East.
· Disproportionate military response: The airstrikes have not only destroyed every police and security office of Gaza's elected government, but have killed and injured hundreds of civilians; at least one strike reportedly hit groups of students attempting to find transportation home from the university.'
This savagery towards Palestinians has been going on since the Zionist terror groups began their campaign of violence to secure the State of Israel and the scale of this ongoing evil has often been suppressed by the fear of being called 'anti-Semitic'.
The Rothschild dynasty has created a vast network of 'anti-hate' groups, like the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and so many others, to label as 'anti-Semitic' or 'racist' anyone who dares to expose or condemn Israel or its networks of manipulation within the United States and elsewhere.
Politicians (though all but are a few are terrified or rewarded into silence), university professors, people like me, and anyone with any kind of public stage, are immediately condemned by the ADL and smeared as 'racist' with support from the Robot Radicals of the Robot 'Left' if they expose Israel or anyone who happens to be Jewish.
The irony of those claiming to be the chosen people and above all others accusing anyone else of racism boggles the bloody mind.
Jewish people who challenge the tyranny, like the superb Norman Finkelstein, are dubbed 'self-haters' and often lose their jobs and livelihoods as a result. The Rothschild 'anti-hate' groups put any Big Brother to shame.
But we can't ­ and MUST NOT ­ stay silent on the plight of the Palestinians because we fear the consequences for ourselves. What are we, mice??
This is not about racism; it is about fascism and the daily onslaught against a helpless and tragic people. I don't give a shit what the ADL thinks about what I say, nor those on the 'Left' who parrot its propaganda like the juveniles that they are.
It needs saying and therefore someone needs to say it.
And, by the way, those that are running the Zionist agenda, which is part of much bigger global agenda in league with the Illuminati families, don't give a damn for Jewish people in general. They, too, are just an expendable irrelevance to the greater goal.
As the first Israeli Prime Minister, the terrorist, David Ben-Gurion, said:
'If I knew that it was possible to save all the children of Germany by transporting them to England, and only half by transferring them to the Land of Israel, I would choose the latter, for before us lies not only the numbers of these children but the historical reckoning of the people of Israel.'
What kind of sick mind does it take to say that? The kind that has run Israel since 1948 would appear to be the answer.
We need to drop the ludicrous, childish, labels of Jew and Gentile and Muslim and all this illusory crap and come together in the name of peace and justice for all. There is not a Jewish injustice or a Palestinian injustice, there is simply injustice.
Justice for one and no justice for another is 'justice' for no-one. For justice has no meaning unless it applies to all, and it will never apply to the Palestinians while the world stays silent and looks the other way.
Disclaimer z

Support Free And HonestJournalism At Rense.com
document.write
("EmailArticle");
EmailArticle
Subscribe To RenseRadio!Enormous Online Archives,MP3s, Streaming Audio Files, Highest Quality Live Programs

Below is a list of sources consulted in the making of this documentary. Viewers are encouraged to delve into the research directly via the hyperlinks provided and to come to their own conclusions about this material.
Prologue
#
claim
source
link
1
9/11 news coverage
For an excellent source of live television coverage from the day of 9/11, please visit the September 11 Television Archive, currently hosted at archive.org.
[Link]
2
"Honey Trade Said to Provide Funds and Cover to Bin Laden"
Judith Miller article from the New York Times on October 11, 2001 about how Bin Laden and his Al Qaeda network were using money from honey dealing to finance their terrorist operations.
[Link]
3
""U.S. SAYS HUSSEIN INTENSIFIES QUEST FOR A-BOMB PARTS""
Another New York Times article from Judith Miller (see above), this one claiming that Saddam Hussein was stepping up his activities to build a nuclear weapon for Iraq. This infamous article alleges Hussein's efforts to acquire aluminum tubes for his (imaginary, as it turns out) nuclear program. It was emblematic of Miller's reporting for the Times which relied heavily on leaks from the Administration itself. Ultimately, the Times would disown Miller and her questionable reporting, despite the fact that she had at one time been considered a star reporter.
[Link]
4
Cheney says Osama not involved in 9/11
This comes from the March 26, 2006 interview conducted by Tony Snow. Although in the context of the discussion Cheney was likely referring to Saddam Hussein and misspoke, it is interesting to note that President Bush famously made the exact same mistake in the exact same context in the 2004 Presidential debate when he said "Of course we're after Saddam Hussein - I mean Bin Laden." The repeated "confusion" of Bin Laden and Hussein only serves to demonstrate the point that for the Bush Administration, these men are merely placeholders for whatever the Administration's agenda is at the moment, and as such they are interchangeable. The comment also reminds us of the FBI's official position that they do not list 9/11 on their Osama Bin Laden wanted page because
there is no hard evidence connecting him to 9/11. In the light of all of the evidence presented in this documentary, this misstatement by Cheney amounts to an unintentional truth.
[Link]
Part One - Founding and Funding
#
claim
source
link
1
Brzezinski is Obama's foreign policy advisor
Although Brzezinski's position within the Obama Administration remains largely undefined, the fact that he advises Obama, both directly and indirectly, is evident from mainstream articles such as this one from the New York Sun. The clip is of Obama praising Brzeznski after Zbigniew introduced Obama's first major foreign policy speech of his Presidential campaign. For more information on the relationship of Obama and Brzezinski, please see the work of Webster Tarpley, especially
Barack H. Obama: The Unauthorized Biography.
[Link]
2
Brzezinski addresses the mujahadeen
Brzezinski addressing the Afghani freedom fighters (and future terrorists) during a trip to Pakistan.
[Link]
3
Operation Cyclone
Basic information about the US involvement in Afghanistan.
[Link]
4
Brzezinski interview with French periodical
An English translation of this important 1998 interview with Dr. Brzezninski.
[Link]
5
The official story - The US funded the Afghans, the Saudis funded the Arabs
A 2003 article by Richard Miniter espousing the official story that the Americans had nothing to do with the Arab Afghans.
[Link]
6
Osama's group consisted of a dozen fighters in 1989
For this remarkable fact, see page 4 of Jason Burke's book, Al-Qaeda.
[Link]
7
Bin Laden claims the name Al Qaeda comes from the Afghan training camps
Transcript of interview with Bin Laden from October 2001.
[Link]
8
Robin Cook article
Article by former leader of the House in England, Robin Cook, asserting "Al Qaeda" refers to the database of mujahedeen handled by the CIA in Afghanistan.
[Link]
9
Ana raicha Al Qaeda is colloquial for I'm going to the toilet.
From a report by Kawther Salam under the headline "'Al Qaeda' is a Manufactured Intelligence Front."
[Link]
10
Michael Springmann testimony
Testimony to the 9-11 Citizens Commission in 2004.
[Link]
11
11 of the 911 hijackers received their visas from the Jeddah consulate
See page 6 of this GAO report for this fact.
[Link]
12
Information about the Visa Express program.
The program started just months before 9-11 was designed to fast track qualified applicants to get visas to visit the US.
[Link]
13
Der Spiegel calls Osama one of the CIA's best customers during the Afghan war
From a 2007 report on "The Checkered History of American Weapons Deals."
[Link]
14
BBC on Osama-CIA links
BBC reports that Bin Laden had CIA security training.
[Link]
15
The New Jackals
CIA source claims the CIA cut deals with Osama to arm him at rock bottom prices. From page 168 of Simon Reeve's book The new Jackals.
[Link]
16
Osama and the MAK
Contains information on Osama's position in the MAK and many other important pieces of information.
[Link]
17
CIA and ISI involvement with heroin
Contains information about the CIAs plan to get Soviet troops addicted to heroin.
[Link]
18
CIA worked in tandem with Pakistan to create Taliban
A leading South Asian expert from a prestigious American think tank outlines how the CIA and Pakistan created the Taliban.
[Link]

.information clearing house.info

By Robert Fisk
It's a wrap, a doddle, an Israeli ceasefire just in time for Barack Obama to have a squeaky-clean inauguration with all the world looking at the streets of Washington rather than the rubble of Gaza
Audio and TextFatah by now is more or less functioning as Israel's police force in the West Bank. But the West Bank is only part of the occupied Palestinian territories.

An Open Letter to Obama 4 Minute VideoObama, take away the pain in my stomach.
By Yvonne Ridley
Gaza will rise again from the rubble with its people even stronger than before. They are an example to resistance fighters across the world and they will go down in history for their bravery and courage.

The Power of AIPAC
By Brian Crowley The worst of all the barbarians who are killing children and their mothers and fathers in Gaza are the Israeli pilots who mercilessly bomb houses occupied by terrified families. And they are staunchly supported by the House of Representatives of the United States of America.
By Rev.
Martin Luther King In his "Beyond Vietnam" speech delivered at New York's Riverside Church on April 4, 1967 --
a year to the day before he was murdered -- King called the United States "the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today." Time magazine called the speech "demagogic slander that sounded like a script for Radio Hanoi," and the Washington Post declared that King had "diminished his usefulness to his cause, his country, his people.

View Part One of Al Qaeda Doesn't Exist




View Part One of Al Qaeda Doesn't Exist

Qaeda Doesn't Exist - 2Part One of the Al Qaeda Doesn't Exist documentary from The Corbett Report, dealing with the founding and funding of what we know as Al Qaeda. This installment of the documentary goes into Zbigniew Brzezinski, Operation Cyclone, the ISI-CIA-MAK-US government funding circle and CIA

connections to Osama Bin Laden.


by corbettreport
Al Qaeda Doesn't Exist - 2Part One of the Al Qaeda Doesn't Exist documentary from The Corbett Report, dealing with the founding and funding of what we know as Al Qaeda. This installment of the documentary goes into Zbigniew Brzezinski, Operation Cyclone, the ISI-CIA-MAK-US government funding circle and CIA connections to Osama Bin Laden.

Click here for the direct link
Update HistoryJanuary 2 - Added
bibliography to websiteDecember 31 - Uploaded Prologue.November 22 - Uploaded documentary Trailer

.November 15 - Launched website.

How do Holocaust survivors in Israel feel about being called Nazis

Robert Fisk’s World:
When it comes to Gaza, leave the Second World War out of it
Exaggeration always gets my goat. I started to hate it back in the 1970s when the Provisional IRA claimed that Long Kesh internment camp was "worse than Belsen". It wasn't as if there was anything nice about Long Kesh – or the Maze prison as it was later politely dubbed – but it simply wasn't as bad as Belsen. And now we're off again. Passing through Paris this week, I found pro-Palestinian demonstrators carrying signs which read "Gaza, it's Guernica" and "Gaza-sur-Glane".
Guernica, as we all know, was the Basque city razed by the Luftwaffe in 1937 and Oradour-sur-Glane the French village whose occupants were murdered by the SS in 1944. Israel's savagery in Gaza has also been compared to a "genocide" and – of course – a "holocaust". The French Union of Islamic Organisations called it "a genocide without precedent" – which does take the biscuit when even the Pope's "minister for peace and justice" has compared Gaza to "a big concentration camp".
Before I state the obvious, I only wish the French Union of Islamic Organisations would call the Armenian genocide a genocide – it doesn't have the courage to do so, does it, because that would be offensive to the Turks and, well, the million and a half Armenians massacred in 1915 happened to be, er, Christians.
Mind you, that didn't stop George Bush from dropping the word from his vocabulary lest he, too, should offend the Turkish generals whose airbases America needs for its continuing campaign in Iraq. And even Israel doesn't use the word "genocide" about the Armenians lest it loses its only Muslim ally in the Middle East. Strange, isn't it? When there's a real genocide – of Armenians – we don't like to use the word. But when there is no genocide, everyone wants to get in on the act.
Yes, I know what all these people are trying to do: make a direct connection between Israel and Hitler's Germany. And in several radio interviews this past week, I've heard a good deal of condemnation about such comparisons. How do Holocaust survivors in Israel feel about being called Nazis? How can anyone compare the Israeli army to the Wehrmacht? Merely to make such a parallel is an act of anti-Semitism.
Having come under fire from the Israeli army on many occasions, I'm not sure that's necessarily true. I've never understood why strafing the roads of northern France in 1940 was a war crime while strafing the roads of southern Lebanon is not a war crime. The massacre of up to 1,700 Palestinians in the Sabra and Chatila camps – perpetrated by Israel's Lebanese Phalangist allies while Israeli soldiers watched and did nothing – falls pretty much into the Second World War bracket. Israel's own estimate of the dead – a paltry 460 – was only nine fewer than the Nazi massacre at the Czech village of Lidice in 1942 when almost 300 women and children were also sent to Ravensbrück (a real concentration camp). Lidice was destroyed in revenge for the murder by Allied agents of Reinhard Heydrich. The Palestinians were slaughtered after Ariel Sharon told the world – untruthfully – that a Palestinian had murdered the Lebanese Phalangist leader Bashir Gemayel.
Indeed, it was the courageous Professor Yeshayahu Leibovitz of the Hebrew University (and editor of the Encyclopaedia Hebraica) who wrote that the Sabra and Chatila massacre "was done by us. The Phalangists are our mercenaries, exactly as the Ukrainians and the Croatians and the Slovakians were the mercenaries of Hitler, who organised them as soldiers to do the work for him. Even so have we organised the assassins of Lebanon in order to murder the Palestinians". Remarks like these were greeted by Israel's then minister of interior and religious affairs, Yosef Burg, with the imperishable words: "Christians killed Muslims – how are the Jews guilty?"
I have long raged against any comparisons with the Second World War – whether of the Arafat-is-Hitler variety once deployed by Menachem Begin or of the anti-war-demonstrators-are-1930s-appeasers, most recently used by George Bush and Lord Blair of Kut al-Amara. And pro-Palestinian marchers should think twice before they start waffling about genocide when the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem once shook Hitler's hand and said – in Berlin on 2 November 1943, to be precise – "The Germans know how to get rid of the Jews... They have definitely solved the Jewish problem." The Grand Mufti, it need hardly be added, was a Palestinian. He lies today in a shabby grave about two miles from my Beirut home.
No, the real reason why "Gaza-Genocide" is a dangerous parallel is because it is not true. Gaza's one and a half million refugees are treated outrageously enough, but they are not being herded into gas chambers or forced on death marches. That the Israeli army is a rabble is not in question – though I was amused to read one of Newsweek's regular correspondents calling it "splendid" last week – but that does not mean they are all war criminals. The issue, surely, is that war crimes do appear to have been committed in Gaza. Firing at UN schools is a criminal act. It breaks every International Red Cross protocol. There is no excuse for the killing of so many women and children.
I should add that I had a sneaking sympathy for the Syrian foreign minister who this week asked why a whole international tribunal has been set up in the Hague to investigate the murder of one man – Lebanese ex-prime minister Rafiq Hariri – while no such tribunal is set up to investigate the deaths of more than 1,000 Palestinians.
I should add, however, that the Hague tribunal may well be pointing the finger at Syria and I would still like to see a tribunal set up into the Syrian massacre at Hama in 1982 when thousands of civilians were shot at the hands of Rifaat al-Assad's special forces. The aforesaid Rifaat, I should add, today lives safely within the European Union. And how about a trial for the Israeli artillerymen who massacred 106 civilians – more than half of them children – at the UN base at Qana in 1996?
What this is really about is international law. It's about accountability. It's about justice – something the Palestinians have never received – and it's about bringing criminals to trial. Arab war criminals, Israeli war criminals – the whole lot. And don't say it cannot be done. Wasn't that the message behind the Yugoslav tribunal? Didn't some of the murderers get their just deserts? Just leave the Second World War out of it.
Interesting?
Click here to explore further

نگاهی به نتایج اولیه جنگ غزه










۲ بهمن ۱۳۸۷ admin
جنگ غزه پس از ۳ هفته که با جنایتبارترین تجاوز اسرائیل همراه بود، به پایان خود رسید ، اما اسرائیل نتوانست به پیروزی نظامی و سیاسی دست یابد و البته از ابتدای شروع جنگ هم چنین انتظاری می رفت. اگر چه اسرائیل به طور یک جانبه آتش بس را اعلام کرد اما جنبش مقاومت حماس پرتاب موشک «گراد» را تا ساعاتی پس از پایان آتش بس اسرائیل ادامه داد تا راه را بر هرگونه ادعای پیروزی اسرائیل ببندد
مصطفی لباد مدیر مرکز مطالعات استراتژیکی خاورمیانه در مرکز الاهرام

نوشته و برگردان احمد مزارعی دنیای ما
مقدمه مترجم: «حسنن ال هیکل»، سردبیر روزنامه الاهرام چاپ قاهره، در مصاحبه با «الجزیره» چنین می گوید: ” پس از پیروزی حماس در انتخابات ۲۰۰۶، آمریکا ، اروپا ، اسرائیل و ابومازن تصمیم گرفتند تا حماس را حذف کنند. دولت آمریکا ژنرال دایتون را با یک میلیارد دلار به اسرائیل فرستاد تا ترتیب کار را بدهد. وی با کمک محمد دهلان ستون پنجمی در غزه برای کودتا برعلیه حماس به صورت مخفیانه سازماندهی کرد که توسط حماس کشف و سرکوب شد. در میان آنان تعدادی از اعضای الفتح نیز دیده می شدند. پس از شکست برنامه کودتا ، دولت اسرائیل تصمیم به محاصره و در گرسنگی قرار دادن مردم غزه گرفت تا مگر اهالی غزه را بر علیه حماس بشورانند، که این بار هم نتیجه نداد. دولت اسرائیل حماس را در برابر دو راه قرار داد: یا از گرسنگی بمیرند، و یا تسلیم شوند. حماس مقاومت برگزید و من آنان را تائید می کنم.”سرکوب حماس، به منظور به گور سپردن مقاومت مردم فلسطین بر علیه اشغالگران اسرائیلی بود که با شکست فاحشی روبرو شد. دیوید راس محقق انگلیسی روز جمعه ۱۶ ژانویه در مصاحبه با رادیو «سی بی سی» کانادا، روایت مشابه ای همچون حسنن ال هیکل داشت و در بخشی از سخنانش چنین گفت:” هم اکنون نزدیک به ۴۰۰ نفر از مخالفان ابومازن و طرفداران حماس که در میانشان چند استاد دانشگاهی نیز دیده می شوند، در زندان «تشکیلات خودگردان فلسطین» در رام الله بسر می برند. این زندانیان بتوسط ماموران« سی آی ا» زیر شکنجه و فشار قرار دارند تا از عقاید خود برگشته و برعلیه حماس با دولت ابومازن همکاری کنند.
”آنچه درغزه و فلسطین گذشت توطئه شومی از طرف آمریکا، اسرائیل و ابومازن برای سرکوبی و نابودی مقاومت مردم فلسطین بود که تا اینجا با شکست روبرو شده است.
مقاومت مردم فلسطین نزدیک به ۶۰ سال است که ادامه دارد و ربطی به این یا آن کشور ندارد. اینکه جمهوری اسلامی و یا دیگران می خواهند از این جنبش بنفع خود بهره برداری کنند ، مبارزه مردم فلسطین را خدشه دار نمی کند. هم اکنون بنا به آمار سازمان ملل، بیش از ۴ میلیون آواره فلسطینی در کشورهای دیگر زندگی می کنند، ۵۲ درصد زمین های غرب رود اردن، بتوسط مهاجران یهودی اروپای شرقی و غربی مصادره و در آن شهرک ساخته شده است. یک میلیون و ۴۰۰ هزار اصله درخت زیتون و مرکبات برای ساختن این شهرک ها ریشه کن شده است. مبارزه امروز مردم فلسطین و در راس آنان حماس را در مرحله فعلی باید از این منظر نگریست و نه اینکه حماس سازمانی اسلامی و بنیادگراست. صرف داشتن اعتقادات اسلامی، آنهم برای ملت فلسطین، دلیلی بر نفی مبارزات ضد استعماری و ضد اشغالگری و آزادیخواهانه آنان نمی شود.

چند روز قبل از شروع جنگ غزه، خالد مشعل در مصاحبه ای با آلن گرش، معاون سردبیر لوموند دیپلماتیک اظهار داشت:

” ما حاضریم موجودیت اسرائیل را در چارچوب مرزهای ۱۹۶۷ به رسمیت بشناسیم.”
شرکت حماس در مصالحه دولت وحدت ملی و همکاری با ابومازن، به معنی این بود که آنان با شناسایی اسرائیل در مرزهای ۱۹۶۷ مشکلی ندارند. اما اسرائیل و آمریکا، بدنبال صلح نیستند و نمی خواهند زمین های اشغالی بعد از سال ۱۹۶۷ را تخلیه کنند و بنا به نوشته سایت حقوق بشر اسرائیل، ” دولت اسرائیل در همه دوره هایی که با فلسطینی ها مذاکرات ” صلح” به پیش می برده حتی برای یکروز هم از اشغال زمین های تازه، و ساختن شهرک دست برنداشته است و این روند اکنون نیز ادامه دارد.”

مصطفی لبادبرگردان احمد مزارعی
نگاهی به نتایج اولیه جنگ غزه کارفون کلاوزویچ شکست اسرائیل را بشارت داد
جنگ غزه پس از ۳ هفته که با جنایتبارترین تجاوز اسرائیل همراه بود، به پایان خود رسید ، اما اسرائیل نتوانست به پیروزی نظامی و سیاسی دست یابد و البته از ابتدای شروع جنگ هم چنین انتظاری می رفت. اگر چه اسرائیل به طور یک جانبه آتش بس را اعلام کرد اما جنبش مقاومت حماس پرتاب موشک «گراد» را تا ساعاتی پس از پایان آتش بس اسرائیل ادامه داد تا راه را بر هرگونه ادعای پیروزی اسرائیل ببندد. حماس با این عمل خود اجازه نداد اسرائیل بر اجساد مردم فلسطین بایستد و فریاد پیروزی سر دهد. توپخانه اسرائیل ، هواپیماها و ناوهای جنگی این کشور ساکت شدند. آبها از آسیاب افتاد تا منظره تازه ای از اوضاع سیاسی خاورمیانه را رقم زند که تا حد بسیار زیادی با زمان قبل از جنگ فرق دارد. هم اکنون معادلات و توازنات منطقه خاورمیانه بهم خورده ، برنامه ریزی های سیاسی سابق درهم ریخته و مخلوط شده و خاورمیانه در برابر واقعیات تازه ای قرار دارد که از میدان عملیات جنگ غزه فراتر می رود. تشکیلات گسترده مهندسی ارتش اسرائیل که با انواع هواپیماها ، هلیکوپترها، و امکانات تکنولوژیکی گسترده ای برخوردار است نتوانست بر محدودیت اصلی ارتش اسرائیل غلبه کند، زیرا این ارتش و این دستگاه کشتار هیبت خود را برای دومین بار بعد از جنگ با حزب الله از دست داد. حماس در این جنگ نشان داد که مانند سابق به بیانیه های پر طمطراق بسنده نکرده بلکه تفوقی عظیم در بصیرت سیاسی و تا حد بسیار زیادی در اداره کردن جنگ دارد. حماس نشان داد که تا حد زیادی به شرایط محیط و اهداف اسرائیل در این جنگ تسلط دارد، در این جنگ حماس پیروزی هایی بدست آورد که حتی برای مخالفین سیاسی و ایدئولوژیک خود به سختی قابل باور بود. حماس از جنگی که المرت و حزبش در غزه برایش رقم زده بودند، پیروز بیرون آمد. برجسته ترین پیروزی حماس در این بود که توانست برای اولین بار، موشک های « گراد » خود را علیرغم ناچیز بودن قدرت تخریب آن، تا منطقه «بئرسبع» ، «اشدود» و «عسقلان» نیز برساند. ارتش اسرائیل علیرغم تشکیلات گسترده و جبارش و به مدت ۳ هفته شدیدترین بمباران ها نتوانست عملیات خود را به پیروزی سیاسی تبدیل کند و به سیاست واضحی دست یابد. بطوریکه استراتژیست ها و متفکران ارتش اسرائیل دوباره به ادبیاتی از قبیل دستگیری و تجربه از جنگ غزه بازگشته اند.
«کلاوزویچ» استراتژیست معروف آلمانی در فرهنگ لغات معروف خود که یکی از مهمترین کتابهای علم استراتژی می باشد، چنین می گوید:

” پیروزی تاکتیکی، اگر نتواند تبدیل به پیروزی استراتژیک شود، ضرورتا یک پیروزی مقطعی می باشد.” با این حساب بمباران های اسرائیل و تخریب خانه های مردم بر سرشان به معنی آن نیست که این ارتش موفق شده باشد بنیان های فکری و تشکیلاتی حماس را منهدم کرده باشد، بلکه وجود نیروهای حماس در سراسر منطقه غزه و اداره کردن شهرتوسط آنان نشاندهنده اینست که اسرائیل از نظر سیاسی به پیروزی دست نیافته و تنها موفق به تخریب خانه ها و کشتار مردم بدون دفاع شده است.
در اینجا پیروزی با حماس است که علیرغم قدرت تخریبی ارتش اسرائیل توانست اسلحه و تشکیلات خود را حفظ نماید. بازمی گردیم به نظریه کلاوزویچ و رهنمودهایش. وی در بخشی دیگر از کتاب خود چنین می نویسد:

” نابود کردن نیروهای نظامی دشمن مسئله اصلی در هر جنگی است .”
و این کار یست که ارتش اسرائیل در آن موفقیت بدست نیاورد تا بقدرت اسلحه حماس ضربه وارد آورد و همین موجب تحکیم قدرت سیاسی حماس در منطقه غزه شد. اسرائیل نتوانست سرباز اسیر اسرائیلی را رها کند و نتوانست میان مردم غزه و حماس شکاف بیاندازد. بر عکس از نظر سیاسی در سراسر جهان تظاهرات و پشتیبانی های عظیمی در حمایت از مقاومت مردم فلسطین و در راس آن حماس انجام گرفت. شکست اسرائیل تنها در این زمینه هم نبود، بلکه مصوبه شماره ۱۸۶۰ نیز که در سازمان ملل متحد به تصویب رسید و در آن درخواست آتش بس میان اسرائیل و حماس شد، این معنا و مفهموم را میرساند که سازمان حماس مسئول و حاکم غزه می باشد و این اعتراف از طرف سازمان ملل در حقیقت اعتباری برای سازمان حماس و برسمیت شناختن آنست.
کلاوزویچ در بخش دیگری از کتابش چنین می آورد:” جنگ ادامه سیاست از راههای دیگر است.” اسرائیل به هدف دیگر خود که متوقف کردن پرتاب موشک بدرون شهرهای خود بود موفق نشد و این ادامه شکست سیاست گذشته اسرائیل در جنگ ۲۰۰۶ با حزب الله بود که نه اسیران را توانست آزاد کند و نه از پرتاب موشک حزب الله جلوگیری نماید.
این درست است که حماس سلاح های ضد هوایی و سایر اسلحه های سنگین را ندارد و بدون شک اسرائیل از این نظر برتری دارد، اما این قدرت نظامی اسرائیل در مقابل جنگ های چریکی غیر دولتی کاربرد ندارد. ارتش های چریکی به مانند ارتش های کلاسیک کشورهای غربی نیستند که بتوان با استفاده از فلان نوع تاکتیک به سادگی آنان را به شکست کشانید. اسرائیل با کسانی می جنگد که دارای اسلحه های سبک و متوسط می باشند، و این نیروها به لحاظ ایدئولوژیک و اعتقاد به آزادی سرزمین خود بسیار قدرتمند می باشند. همین مسئله است که باعث شکست اسرائیلی ها در جنگهای سالهای اخیر خود در خاورمیانه شده است.
دوباره به کلاوزویچ بازمی گردیم:

” غرض سیاسی از جنگ کسب اهداف سیاسی است . جنگ هم وسیله ای نیست مگر برای رسیدن به اهداف سیاسی، اما این وسیله را نمی توان از غرض جدا کرد” با انطباق دادن این نظریه بر جنگ غزه این نتیجه بدست می آید که اسرائیل از نظر سیاسی شکست خورده است .نمی توان معادلات و توازنات منطقه ای را با تصمیم یکجانبه در مورد آتش بس خلاصه کرد. کسانیکه در این جنگ سود و زیان برده اند، بر اساس معادلات و توازناتی که عملا اتفاق افتاده ارزیابی می شوند. با این حساب به وضوح می توان دید که جلوگیری از نفوذ منطقه ای ایران که هدف اصلی اسرائیل بود نه تنها تضعیف نشده ، بلکه بسیار قویتر شده است، این جنگ باعث حضور بیشتر ایران در منطقه گردید.
ماحصل آنکه سازمان حماس از این جنگ پیروز بیرون آمده است و با این حساب ایران که حامی حماس بوده است نیز نفوذش در منطقه تقویت شده است. همچنان که شاهد بودیم در جنگ ۲۰۰۶ میان اسرائیل و حزب الله هم نفوذ ایران در منطقه بیشتر گردید . اکنون ما علیرغم همه کوشش های منطقه ای و جهانی، در برابر خود مسئله فلسطین را داریم که همچنان لاینحل باقی مانده است، و ایران هم که یکی از پشتیبانان جنبش رهایبخش فلسطین است، با روندی که در بالا گفته شد، اهمیت بیشتری در منطقه پیدا کرده است.کارل مارکس، فیلسوف آلمانی می گوید:
” تضادهای اصلی بر تضادهای ثانوی پیشی می گیرند.” بنابراین بنظر می رسد که ما می بایستی تحلیل های خود را بر اساس تضادهای اصلی گذارده و از آنجا حرکت نمائیم. نگرش به ظاهر قضایا باید در درجه دوم قرار گیرد. در این صورت است که ما به نتیجه خواهیم رسید . اگر درست به عمق مسئله بیاندیشیم مفاد آن چنین خواهد بود که تضاد اصلی در منطقه ، تضاد میان اعراب واسرائیل است، اما تضاد میان اعراب و ایران جنبه ثانوی دارد.